Finally received the letter from the insurance company as to why my claim was denied. I am not sure if their opinion changed after a peer-to-peer review. But I think it may not. Regardless of that outcome, the fact that this is happening is just ..ummm… messed up.
I am fortunate that I am being treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering, which is one of the leading cancer hospitals in the U.S. My radiation oncologist has been treating me for 6 years. He does not administer proton therapy. He said it is the best thing for me due to the location of the tumors and the potential damage which would be caused by other forms of radiation treatment.
Here is an excerpt from https://www.gmlawyers.com/proton-beam-therapy-insurance-denial/
"Proton beam therapy has become increasingly popular as a form of cancer treatment, but because it costs more than standard radiation, insurance companies routinely refuse to cover it. Often, insurance companies have policies in place classifying proton beam therapy as experimental or investigational. Based on these policies, insurers issue blanket denials of coverage requests without considering the patient’s request and assessing their individual case. Courts have found this type of conduct to be an example of insurance bad faith and have criticized this insurance tactic in the harshest terms.....
Proton beam therapy differs from standard radiation therapy in that it fires protons at the cancer cells rather than x-rays. The advantage of the proton beam is that it is more precise and can be more selectively targeted only at the cancer cells, leaving nearby healthy tissue largely undisturbed. The proton beam can also be customized to fit the size, shape and depth of the tumor in the body, further increasing its precision."
Knock me over with a feather about what they say there.
Google "proton therapy denial" and you can find many examples. Including this one - https://www.propublica.org/article/blue-cross-proton-therapy-cancer-lawyer-denial
It is now over three weeks since it was decided it was time to proceed with proton therapy. As recommended by my radiation oncologist. And which was thought to be the right course of action by other doctors at MSK.
Yet I was denied. Though I have been beaten down a ton by what I have been through the last decade, there are others who are older/in worse shape. Throw this BS at them as they try to keep on living. Right, because cancer is not enough.
A bit of irony in this all - treatment was denied for September 11 through December. I have cancer because of 9/11.